Popular employment assessments measure who a person is.
Not how they decide.
The Role Fit System™ reads how a person actually makes decisions — and whether that fits the role.
Traditional assessments show you what a candidate says they do.
The Role Fit System shows the pattern underneath.
When the answer isn’t clear, people navigate uncertainty in repeatable ways – across situations, under pressure, when the stakes rise.
That’s what we read.
A century of research shows that people respond to uncertainty in consistent, individual ways.1 2
Our patent-pending Role Fit System applies that insight to the work itself — measuring how a person navigates uncertainty, and comparing that pattern to what a specific role actually demands.
The result isn’t a personality label. It’s workplace intelligence for roles where judgment matters.
1 Knight, Risk, Uncertainty, and Profit (1921). 2 Budner (1962); McLain (1993, 2009).
50–200%of salary to replace someone.
That’s the range the research puts on replacing an employee — and it isn’t a flat number. The low end is frontline roles. Senior, judgment-heavy roles — exactly the seats we read — sit at the top of the range.3 4
Replacing a $175k seat can run to roughly $300k once you count the search, the ramp, the missed decisions, and the disruption around it — about 1.7× salary, squarely inside the range for senior roles.
And that’s just the obvious failure. A capable person in a misdrawn role can cost you quietly, and for longer.
3SHRM; Gallup — the widely cited 50–200% of salary range to replace an employee. 4 Center for American Progress (2012): up to 213% of salary for senior, skilled positions (30 case studies across 11 research papers).
It rhymes with how I feel but have never articulated.

The system knew how people always misread me.

I want one for each of my adult kids. They should know this about themselves.

Take our shortened survey and we’ll read how you navigate uncertainty — the same kind of read, abbreviated, that we generate for a candidate.