The Role Fit System™ measures how people decide when the answer isn’t clear — and whether that’s what the job requires.
The résumé was real. The capability was real.
Something important was still missing.
The moments a job actually turns on rarely have an obvious answer. That’s the part almost nothing measures — and the part we do.
Do they act? Wait? Raise it? Or quietly carry it themselves?
Everyone has a default. Most people have never named their own.
And in many roles, those moments are the job.
See past the résumé, the interview, and the personality profile before you commit.
Whether the way someone succeeds today matches what the next role will demand.
Whether underperformance is about capability, management, or a mismatch with the work.
Where different decision patterns cover for each other — and where they create recurring friction.
What the work actually requires, before you assume the person is the problem.
The Role Fit System™ doesn’t label someone decisive, cautious, collaborative, or independent in the abstract. It shows how they respond when the situation itself doesn’t provide a clear answer.
And whether that pattern matches what the work requires.
Because no decision pattern is universally strong. Its value depends on the role.
Research shows that people differ in how they respond when information, outcomes, or expectations are unclear — and that those differences are consistent.1
The patent-pending Role Fit System turns that insight into a practical workplace measurement: mapping how a person navigates uncertainty, and comparing that pattern with what a specific role demands.
Workplace intelligence for the decisions where judgment matters.
1 Budner (1962); McLain (1993, 2009).
Sometimes the person leaves. Sometimes they stay — and the cost shows up as slow decisions, recurring friction, unclear ownership, and performance that never quite matches their apparent ability.
50–200%of salary to replace someone.
That’s the range the research puts on replacing an employee, and it isn’t a flat number. The low end is frontline roles. Senior, judgment-heavy roles — exactly the roles we read — sit at the top of it.2 3
Replacing a $175,000 position can approach $300,000 once you count the search, the ramp, the missed decisions, and the disruption around it — about 1.7× salary, squarely inside the range for senior roles.
And that’s only the obvious failure. A capable person in a misdrawn role can cost you quietly — and for longer.
2SHRM; Gallup — the widely cited 50–200% of salary range to replace an employee. 3 Center for American Progress (2012): up to 213% of salary for senior, skilled positions (30 case studies across 11 research papers).
Take the shortened assessment and see the pattern you rely on when the answer isn’t clear. It’s an abbreviated version of the same measurement used throughout the Role Fit System.
About two minutes. Free · No credit card required.